Friday, 5 June 2015

Article | Media and Development


Media for Development: Issues, Factors and a final Caveat


Prof. (Dr.) Mrinal Chatterjee    

Professor, Indian Institute of Mass Communication (IIMC),



What is Development?
Development is a complex issue, with many different and sometimes contentious definitions. A basic perspective equates development with economic growth. The United Nations Development Programme uses a more detailed definition,[1]  according to which development is to lead long and healthy lives, to be knowledgeable, to have access to the resources needed for a decent standard of living and to be able to participate in the life of the community. Thus, development encompasses other indicators of quality of life, both physical and metaphysical, as an individual and as a member of the society.
Achieving human development is linked to a third perspective of development which views it as freeing people from obstacles that affect their ability to develop their own lives and communities. Development, therefore, is empowerment.[2]
What is Media?
Media is defined as “Communication channels through which news, entertainment, education, data, or promotional messages are disseminated. Media includes every broadcasting and narrowcasting medium such as newspapers, magazines, TV, radio, billboards, direct mail, telephone, fax, and internet.”[3]
However, often it is used to denote ‘news media’ or ‘press’.
What Media does?
Media can play five roles. There can be considerable overlapping in the roles.
·         Media as an Informer: Media informs. That is the primary function of news media. It informs about events; and also about various problems of society, and what causes them, and what is being done or not done about them. This helps fix accountability.
·         Media as a Watchdog: Media defends public interest by keeping watch over the goings on in the society. It is said that sunshine is the best disinfectant. That somebody is watching me- is the best deterrent to lot of social maladies like corruption.
·         Media as an Enabler: Media increases people’s access to information. Information brings them power and to some extent prosperity. If we take a look at the media consumption and development matrix of Kerala and Bihar or Orissa, we shall find that there is a clear relation between access and use of media and development. It also can and often does act like a force multiplier, creating and/or consolidating public opinion.
·         Media as a Public sphere: People can air and share their ideas through mass media. Issues can be discussed. Suggestions for solutions of problems can be aired and discussed.
·         Media as a Platform: Media provides platform, where people can air their grievances, put forth their views, and participate in governance. By providing a platform and acting as a public sphere, it enables people to engage with governance.
Media and Development
As stated earlier, media encompasses several genres with diverse objectives. Depending on its nature, agenda and objective, its engagement with development could range from zero to cursory to nihilistic to the whole hearted one.
Among the media which engages itself with development there could be two broad divisions: media on development and media for development. It needs further explanation.
The news media usually focuses on development from news angle. They may report on development related events/issues, analyze and debate over concerned issues/initiatives. This may be called Development Journalism. The objective basically is to inform the stakeholders and to help them an informed decision by providing analysis and perspective from different angles.
Then there is a section of Media which works for development. This could be NGOs, development activists, Public Relation Personnel of government or even Corporations effecting development projects. This might include a section of news media too. This could be termed as Development Communication. It has a different objective. Development communication is organized effort to use communications processes and media to bring about development by several means including effecting some kind of behaviour change on the part of stakeholders. Its scope and scale of operation is usually bigger than Development Journalism.
Can Media impact Development?
Several research studies have conclusively proved that media influences attitudes, perceptions and decision making; and it generally influences behaviour. Interestingly, it does, often without people knowing it. Consider Albert Bandura’s Social Learning Theory. In social learning theory Albert Bandura (1977) states behaviour is learned from the environment through the process of observational learning.[4] Media often helps create that environment/ambience in which learning takes place.
However it must also be noted that media’s influence is not all pervasive. Media is not the kind of magic bullet that once it was considered to be. Several factors (social, political, behavioral and psychological) impact media’s efficacy.
Besides these, media, especially news media now has to grapple with some issues if it wants to remain relevant in its engagement with development process.
Issues
a.      Control: Media must enjoy considerable freedom to meaningfully engage with the development process.  A controlled media can hardly be effective. Control of the media by a few individuals, corporations or governments is inimical to the media’s ability to effectively carry out its role.
b.      Framing: It is defined as “Setting an approach or query within an appropriate context to achieve a desired result or elicit a precise answer.”[5]. Put simply, it means how do you want your viewers/readers to see an event/issue. Framing in the social sciences refers to a set of concepts and theoretical perspectives on how individuals, groups, and societies organize, perceive, and communicate about reality. In psychology domain, ‘framing effect’ is an example of cognitive bias, in which people react differently to a particular choice depending on whether it is presented as a loss or as a gain. Media can, if it wants, create that bias. Noam Chomsky has elaborated on the concept as ‘manufacturing consent’.
c.       Competition: Media world has become over crowded, at least in India. There are over 84, 000 publications, 700 plus television stations including over 200 news channels, over 500 radio stations including the AIR stations and private stations and countless news sites. In a fiercely competitive field, all players shout and screech for attention; and unfortunately in the competitive screeching the core issue often gets lost.
d.      Trivialisation: The fierce competition in the media world and other factors including financial often make media go for the trivial. Trivialisation erodes its credibility.
Caveat
Media can play a meaningful positive role in the process of development. However, media’s role can be negative for the society if they are selective, biased, sensational, trivial and inclined to propaganda and other vices.
Therefore,
Media must maintain its credibility[6]. Credibility is the source of all power of Media. Media is powerful because people have faith in it. People believe in what appears in media. This faith propels people to action. It may not always translate to immediate physical action. But the impact is there. It shows probably in the next election result or rejection of a policy or in any which way. And because it leads to action, media assume the position of power.
Credibility has two key components: trustworthiness and expertise. Trustworthiness means the condition of being worthy of being trusted.[7] Trust on the other hand means firm belief in the reliability, truth, ability, or strength of someone or something. Being truthful and reliable are two major constructs of trust. Expertise[8] means special skill, knowledge, or judgment. People rely on the reports published in media also because they have faith on the ability of the people doing it.
Media Credibility depends on just two factors: Satya (Truth) and Seva (Service).
Truth- not in any philosophical sense, but in a very mundane physical sense: complete adherence to fact- unbiased, objective.
Service[9] - not in a physical sense but in an altruistic sense: media must have a moral universe, a sense of justice[10] and fairplay; and empathy for the underprivileged.
When Media sticks to ‘truth’ and ‘service’ it almost automatically helps development- physically and socially; and also morally and spiritually.
***


7 April 2013
Sanchar Marg, Dhenkanal 759 001, Odisha



[1] Development is a comprehensive, economic, social, cultural and political process which aims at the constant improvement of the wellbeing of the entire population and of all individuals on the basis of their active, free and meaningful participation in development and in the fair distribution of benefits resulting there from.-UN Definition
[2] http://www.volunteeringoptions.org/VolunteeringDevelopment/WhatisDevelopment/tabid/78/Default.aspx
[3] http://www.businessdictionary.com/definition/media.html#ixzz2PgZO9UUu
Bandura’s social learning theory indicates the effectiveness of human social models in influencing another to change behaviors, beliefs or attitudes, as well as social and cognitive functioning. Through processes such as observation, vicarious experience (experience gained by observing another) and social interaction, one can acquire the behaviors or expertise mediated through a human social model. The theory takes into account that learners can abstract a range of information from the behaviors of others and that learners can then make decisions about which behaviors to adopt and which to ignore or not adopt. Bandura notes that learners may acquire internal codes of behavior that they may or not perform later based on the observation.
http://www.ulqcl.com/kappnotes/index.php/2011/05/banduras-social-learning-theory/
[5] http://www.businessdictionary.com/definition/framing.html
[6] [noun] the quality of being believable or trustworthy. Synonyms: credibleness, believability.
[7] http://www.collinsdictionary.com/dictionary/english/trustworthiness
[8] It consists of those characteristics, skills and knowledge of a person (that is, expert) or of a system, which distinguish experts from novices and less experienced people.  An expert is someone widely recognized as a reliable source of technique or skill whose faculty for judging or deciding rightly, justly, or wisely is accorded authority and status by their peers or the public in a specific well-distinguished domain. An expert, more generally, is a person with extensive knowledge or ability based on research, experience, or occupation and in a particular area of study. An expert can be, by virtue of credential, training, education, profession, publication or experience, believed to have special knowledge of a subject beyond that of the average person, sufficient that others may rely upon the individual's opinion.
[9] Mahatma Gandhi wrote in his autobiography: The Story of My Experiments with the Truth: “In the very first month of Indian Opinion, I realised that the sole aim of journalism should be service (Penguin Books, 1983) ”. This is the essence of ethics for media.
[10] As Martin Luther King, Jr had said,…. “the arc of the moral universe is long, but it bends toward justice.”

Presented as a paper at the seminar on “Frontiers of Development Practices in India: Reconfiguring the Development of Underdevelopment”, 13-14 April 2013, organized by Dept. of Sociology, School of social Sciences, Ravenshaw University, Cuttack


Thursday, 4 June 2015

Column | Window Seat

Puri, now

I was in Puri just two days before DebasnanaPurnima, little over a month and half before Nabakalebara, the mega event which is expected to attract millions of devotees to this small town. The entire town seemed to be dug up throwing all traffic into utter chaos. Residents of Puri are fed up with the incomplete road and drainage works, which seem to go on for ever. Look at the accompanying photographs taken by Ashok Panda on the morning of SnanaPurnima and you will realise what am I taking about. Compounding their woe is ceaseless power disruptions.
The entire town wears a shabby look, with debris thrown by the roadside, waste water flowing on the road from choked drains, small kiosks selling everything from fast food to trinkets practically everywhere in the town. The road from Bhubaneswar to Puri is still incomplete. The two rail crossings are proving to be major bottle necks. The double lining of railway tracks is far from complete. I strongly suspect the delay in finishing many of these works, especially the road and drainage work in Puri town is deliberate. In the last minute hurry many works will be covered up with substandard job at an exorbitant price. The temple, Srimandira, the centre of attraction looked unkempt. Inside, it was crowded beyond its carrying capacity. Even then people were partaking abhada (prasad) inside the temple, blocking pathways. There were far too many police persons, many of them clueless about what they were supposed to do.
Nabakalebara is just round the corner. and Puri is in a mess. Only a miracle can save it from sliding into a chaos.
Near the Hospital at Puri badadanda. Photo: Ashok Panda

Decentralised Planning 

Recently I attended a Media Workshop on Decentralised Planning: Development and Mass Media. I was to deliberate on the role of media in decentralised planning and development and to focus on the challenges and opportunities in reporting this. The workshop was organised by Govt. of India and UNDP. That the Govt. has woken up to decentralised planning and implementation is in itself an encouraging sign. The good intentions have not yet shown any practical impact at the ground level is another story.
I feel there are just four issues which impede decentralisation of planning and execution.
a. Socio-psychological condition of people both at the grass roots and at the bureaucracy and higher political domain
b. Administrative bottle necks
c. Capacity Building
d. Financial Decentralisation.
These four issues need to be sorted out, or at least engaged with for decentralisation.

Tailpiece 1: Sun 

Kaas, Surajkivibiwihoti…. To use toda to control me rakhti… (If Sun had a wife, then she would have kept in some control)

Tailpiece 2: Maggi

Q: What is the gender of Maggi? A: Male. It gets ready in 2 minutes. (Courtesy: A social media forward)
*** 
3 June 2015

Journalist turned media academician MrinalChatterjee also writes fiction. He lives in Dhenkanal. He can be contacted at mrinalchatterjee@ymail.com
Read this column here:
http://www.orissadiary.com/ShowOriyaColumn.asp?id=59438

Window Seat is a regular column in www.orissadiary.com

Column | Jagate Thiba Jetedina, 6-12 June



Wednesday, 3 June 2015

Cartoonists of Odisha | Santosh Mahapatra


Cartoonists of Odisha | Santosh Mohapatra


Santosh Mahapatra (born 28th July, 1980 at Khurda) regularly draws cartoons for Odia daily Sanchar.
He did Bachelors in Fine Arts from Utkal University of Culture, Bhubaneswar.
Besides drawing political and social cartoons, he is thickly into animation. He has worked in many prestigious projects including Arjun the warrior, ROAD SIDE ROMEO, TARA RUM PUM, GANESHA as Concept Artist. He has worked as Story Board Artist for several films like KIDNAP. He has also worked as layout Artist in Television serials like Curious George (of Warner Bros).
His email: santosh.bfa@gmail.com












Monday, 1 June 2015

Cartoonists of Odisha | Dillip Khuntia

Dillip Khuntia

Bhadrak based Dillip Khuntia ( born on April Fool’s Day in 1958) is a journalist and cartoonist. He has drawn cartoons for several newspapers and periodicals including Prajatantra, Matrubhasa, Krantidhara, Dainik Orissa Bhaskar, Eswar, Kalantara, Sakal,  Bisesh Khabar (weekly), Cartoon Duniya (multi lingual monthly Cartoon magazine) from early 1990s.
He had his schooling at Ranihat High School, Cuttack. He studied in NC College, Jajpur and Bhadrak College. He developed interest in fine arts from his student days and indulged in that as a profession.   He drew film posters, book illustrations and also several cartoon strips for children in several magazines. He has a keen sense of humour and gradually began to draw social and political cartoons. Gradually he also developed interest in journalism and worked as reporter for several newspapers.

His younger brother Ashok (known as Silpee Ashok) is also a well-known cartoonist.





Article | Media and Environment

Forest for Sustainable Development: Role of Media
Dr. Mrinal Chatterjee
Professor, Indian Institute of Mass Communication (IIMC)
Sanchar Marg, Dhenkanal 759 001, Odisha, India

Some questions to start with:
1. What is development? And, what is sustainable development?
2. What is the role of forest in sustainable development?
3. What is the role of media?
4. Can and should media play any role in development? If it can, and should- what is that role? And how can media play that role? What is the road map?

What is Development?
Answer to this simple question can differ from country to country, for it has subjective, formative and cultural dimensions. Taking these into considerations- attempts have been made to have a universally acceptable definition. Attempts have also been made to quantify concepts like development and poverty. Development can be measured in terms of GDP, calorie intake, per capita spending, per capita energy consumption, etc. But any quantitative measure one applies will have its detractors and critics. Hence, it is prudent to define development with the help of yet another set of concepts: personal and social well-being, fulfillment of basic necessities like food, shelter, education, health services, communication facilities; a sense of security, peace, freedom of expression, freedom of choice, etc.
It is interesting to note the way UN defined it: “Development is a comprehensive, economic, social, cultural and political process which aims at the constant improvement of the wellbeing of the entire population and of all individuals on the basis of their active, free and meaningful participation in development and in the fair distribution of benefits resulting there from.”
What is Sustainable Development?
The term ‘sustainable development’ emerged in 1980s in response to a situation, when economic development using natural resources and concern for ecology clashed. The questions that became increasingly more pronounced was: development at what cost? Can the earth survive the onslaught of development? To strike a balance between the need for development using natural resources and planet earth’s fast dwindling assets- the concept of ‘sustainable development’ emerged.
Sustainable development is necessary for the earth to survive for the situation is really grim.  Polar ice caps are melting faster than ever. More and more land is being devastated by drought and desertification. The amount of the earth’s surface afflicted by drought has more than doubled since the 1970s. Rising waters are drowning low-lying communities. Global warming is already disrupting the biological world, pushing many species to the brink of extinction[1]. Scientists fear we may be approaching the point of no return.
Most of the situations are the results of so called ‘development’. For example, we know that burning fossil fuels releases carbon, which is the main reason of global warming. But still, it is used- in large quantity. The U.S. with less than 5% of the world’s population, produces one quarter of all greenhouse gases. Deforestation, through clear cutting or burning, sows havoc far beyond the affected area. The fire releases still more carbon into the atmosphere, fewer plants survive to convert carbon-di-oxide into oxygen, and scorched soil absorbs more heat and retains less water, increasing droughts.
Development, the way the world sees it now, requires energy. Development requires forest to be denuded. Development ironically has always been a conflict zone: conflict with environment, conflict with people fearing development, conflict with lovers of status-quo, conflict with people affected adversely by development. Sustainable development tries to minimize the damage to the environment and ecology. Therefore there will be clash of interests. Sustainable development will require less consumption of many goods.  This can not augur well with the manufacturers of those goods. That will create conflict. Hence is the need for a hard look at development not merely from economic angle but from ecological and humane angles.

Forest
Odisha is the fourth largest among all Indian states in terms of the extent of forest cover, with per Capita Forest of 0.16 ha, which is more than double the national average. The state is naturally the abode of immense diversity of wild life.[2]
As per the report of the Forest Survey of India using remote sensing techniques, the forest cover in the State is 48,855 sq. kms of which 7,073 sq. kms is very dense forest. The moderately dense forest extends over 21,394 sq. kms while open forest is over 20,388 sq. kms. The forest cover in the State constitutes 31.38% of the geographical area. Besides this, there exists tree cover outside the forest over 2.85% of the geographical area of the State. Thus the forest and tree cover in the State is 34.23% of the geographical area.
The forest cover in the State is rich in biodiversity and density. There are two National parks, 18 Sanctuaries and one Biosphere Reserve in the State. There are two notified and one proposed Tiger Reserves namely Similipal, Satkosia and Sunabeda (proposed).There are three elephant reserves in the State namely Mayurbhanj, Sambalpur and Mahanadi. The protected area for wildlife management constitutes 4.25% of the total geographical area of the State.[3]

Forest for Sustainable Development
Forests help sustain ecological balance. Besides supporting a large number of plant, animal and bird species it retains the moisture, ground water and top soil. Forests act as lungs of the nature. It helps create rain and sustain the rivers. Millions of people have been relying on the forests to earn a living for centuries. The world needs forests for its survival. However, increasing population and increasing demands on forests gradually are taking a toll on the forests.
Threats to the Forest
There are several threats to the forest. If we consider the case of forest of Odisha the major threats are:
a.      Mining and Industrialization: Rapid economic activities have put unprecedented pressure on our environment and natural resources such as land, water, air, soil and forest. Forests are denuded and degraded for industrialization. The large-scale mining in the forest areas has significantly impacted the environment.
b.      Increasing human activity inside forest area
c.       Illicit felling
d.      Uncontrolled grazing  
e.      Encroachments
f.        Forest Fire: Since most of the forests of Odisha are deciduous in nature, forest fire becomes a problem and menace to flora and fauna.
All these impact forest and wild life critically. Take Angul district as a test case.

Angul district covers forest areas managed under entire Angul, Athamallik, Satakosia(WL) divisions and Pallahara range of Deogarh Forest Division. Established in 1885 Angul Forest Division is the oldest Forest Division in the State. It covers forest areas of Angul and Talcher civil Sub-division of Angul District. The total geographical area of Angul and Talcher Sub-Disvision is 3336.63 Sq.Km. This includes 427.008 Sq.Km. of Satakosia Sanctuary area. With the transfer of 427.088 Sq.Km. area to the administrative control of Wild Life Division, the area of the Division is 2909.542 Sq.Km. The forest area involves the reserve forests, demarcated protected forests, un-demarcated protected forests and forests under revenue records. Total forest area constitutes 37% of the geographical area. Although Angul is one of the pioneer Divisions where scientific management of forests commenced, forests have been depleted. As per the survey of India report the percentage of forest under various density classes have shrunk. It remains at: Dense forest- 19%, Open forest- 51%, Shrub Forest- 30 %. Man-animal conflict has grown many folds.[4]

It is not that the government is unaware of the situation. Odisha government has a proactive forest department. They have a vision document ready to mitigate the situation and improve the forest cover and wild life health. Elements of the Vision Principles include the following[5]:
1. Forest planning and operations are sustainable and balance environmental services, local use, and commercial extraction.
2. Environmental services from forests are recognized and protected.
3. Local subsistence and forest based livelihood use has the first charge on forests, especially in scheduled areas based on strong incentives for local participation. Customary rights and usage are protected.
4. Operations and procedures are simple, transparent and effective.
5. Regulatory burdens and transaction costs are low.
A look at the vision summary will not be out of place here:
Orissa's forests are well stocked, diverse, multi-storied and dense. The forests are managed for sustained use providing a range of goods and services to a variety of stakeholders at local and broader levels. Forests are home to flora and fauna, build soil, regulate water flows, provide quality water as well as small wood, timber and NTFPs. They provide inputs to the agricultural economy, income to the impoverished and subsistence livelihood to all.
An enabled and responsive Forest Department and empowered local community institutions collaborate to protect forest areas from encroachment, poaching, illicit felling and fire. Flexible forest tenure allows a diversity of institutions and forest categories at different spatial and temporal scales. Categories reflect function: Protected Areas protect representative habitats and species, Reserves are for environmental protection, subsistence use and commercial production.
Forests are managed under a range of participatory options (Participatory Forest Management (PFM)), for local use, sale of surplus and commercial use. All categories, however, respect local rights and provide strong incentives for local participation in protection, management and use. Diversion of forest for development projects invite disincentives and increased cost and local compensation after due process. Transparent operations and procedures reduce transaction costs for harvesting timber and NTFPs and starting and operating enterprises, reduce externalities in terms of social and ecological impacts, and maintain confidence in the integrity of forest management and operations.

A critical look at the ‘vision’ will tell that it envisages people’s proactive participation and stake holder’s intimate engagement. There is a paradigm shift here. From the old exclusivist policy trying to keep people away from forest- the State now wants the people to take an active role in preserving and managing forest. But for doing that, the people, especially the stake holders must have awareness about the importance of the forest and also right mindset and attitude to preserve forest. A social security net for the forest must emerge, so that forest resources are used and not abused and looted.
Role of Media
At the most basic level media is a means of communication and vehicle of information. Period. But, why it is so important? Because media has added power onto itself by acting and speaking out on behalf of the people. It has gained credibility over the years. People believe in what is being told, written and shown on media. People and to some extent policy makers form their opinion on the basis of information, analysis, and suggestion given by the media. It does not happen always. But it happens often enough to have vested enormous power on media. Countless number of research studies have shown that media can and do influence human thought and behaviour. From fashion to stardom to creating positive attitude for development issues- media can influence, and therein lies its power.
            But as it has been mentioned- it does not happen always. People do not believe everything that has been told in the media. People do not always act as the media tells them to. People exercise their will. They exercise their choice- based on their liking or disliking. Hence the question: can media trigger, sustain and guide development? Can it become a positive change agent? Should it be one? If it can work as a change agent, how must it work? What is the roadmap?
            But before we attempt to answer these questions, a word about the present day media. Media is an omnibus term. It includes a wide range of communication system, which often targets different set of audience, at times working on cross purposes. Let me divide it into three broad categories: entertainment media, news media and education media. Each of these categories has separate objective and paradigm. That makes their content and format different. Each category has separate culture, separate sets of dos and don’ts. Each category has different attitude to societal issues.  For example, on the issue of prioritizing sustainable development- the news media might ask: Should it be a change agent? News media will ask this question because they see their job differently. News media’s priority is to disseminate news and not to become a change agent. Similarly the entertainment media’s priority is to entertain and not to become a change agent. Education media might like to be a change agent, and then they would ask: how must it work? What is the roadmap? 
            Of course, there can never be tight compartmentalization among these three categories of media. And increasingly so. As Alvin Toffler says in his now cult book Power Shift ...‘for better or worse, the old lines between show business and politics, leisure and work, news and entertainment are all crashing, and we are exposed to a hurricane of often fragmented, kaleidoscopic images[6].
            That is making the task of following a particular agenda by the media both easy and difficult. Easy- because of the tremendous reach and penetration of media. Difficult- because there are so many of them. India now has 500 plus television channels and 60,000 plus newspapers and periodicals. The sheer vastness of media has made the task difficult- as it has become difficult for any particular medium or channel or publication to sustain the interest of the readers.
The problem of ‘reach’ and ‘access’ is withering. The problem of ‘reach’ is taken care of by developing technology. The problem of ‘access’ is taken care of by growing purchasing power of the people and a kind of societal pressure to ‘own- what-your neighbour has’.  But when it comes to use, the problem has grown. It is a problem of plenty. Problem of choice from a vast plethora of media bouquets- each one trying of vie for attention. In a situation like this, media supplies what people want. It changes from being need-oriented to demand-driven. It caters not to what the audience needs (in a sense what they ought to watch), but what they want and are ready to pay for. If people want development-oriented content, media would supply that. If they want something else, it would supply that. Media content is treated like FMCG (fast moving consumer goods) in a bazaar. The salesman will stock goods - that sells fast. Since development stories do not receive priority on the reader/viewer’s point - it fails to fetch advertisement- life line of most of private news media, it is not given priority in the media. It is as simple as that. 
            But there is a silver lining.  In fact, two. First, in a de-massified society media caters to the niche. So, if there are people who are interested in development through media- there are certain media dedicated to that. Second- improved technology has made access and use of media easy. Hence sustainable development as an issue can and do find space and time in the media easily.  The problem lies in mainstreaming the issue, to put that issue on top priority for mainstream news media in particular and other category of media in general.
Now onto the question what roles media can play? Media can play five roles. There can be considerable overlapping in the roles.
•          Media as a Watchdog: It is said that sunshine is the best disinfectant. That somebody is watching me- is the best deterrent to lot of social maladies like corruption.
•          Media as an Enabler: Media increases people’s access to information. Information brings them power and to some extent prosperity. If we take a look at the media consumption and development matrix of Kerala and Bihar or Odisha, we shall find that there is a clear relation between access and use of media and development.
•          Media as a Public sphere: People can air and share their ideas through mass media. Issues can be discussed. Suggestions for solutions of problems can be aired and discussed. For example media can help discuss the suggestions M S Swaminathan offered to mitigate hunger and ensuring food security in the ‘Food Security Atlas’.  Socially responsible journalism is a struggle to gain public space within the private sphere.
•          Media as an Informer: Media can inform people about various problems of society, and what causes them, and what is being done or not done about them. This helps fix accountability.
•          Media as a Platform: Media can provide a platform, where people can air their grievances, put forth their views, and participate in governance.

Let us now understand the function and dynamics of mainstream news media. It’s priority is to disseminate news. In other words their foremost task is to tell the readers, listeners, viewers- what has happened and how it has happened and why it has happened. With the technology advancing by leaps and bounds, their task has changed from telling what has happened to what is happening, and how is it happening. This has put more emphasis on the ‘now’ factor. It has put more emphasis on ‘events’. Adopting sustainable development is a ‘process’. It does not get their top priority. This fact has to be appreciated first. Then we can proceed to examine what the news media in particular and other categories of media can do.
            1. Media can definitely create an atmosphere of acceptance for sustainable development. It can set an agenda.
            2. Sustainable development, as we have discussed is susceptible to conflicts. Media can reduce the intensity and impact of these conflicts and may be make development acceptable, or a step further - desirable. Besides news media, other media like popular cinema, television soap-operas, and even folk media can play a role here. Products are being advertised through surrogate advertising. What is the harm in using that technique to promote a concept, certain ideas? That is social marketing all about. If at present ‘sustainable development’ is not getting its due space and time in media, let us steal time and what I’ll call ‘mind space’ with stealth.  At a time when information fatigue is being felt- it will be prudent to adopt extraordinary ways, out of the box thinking to put the issue of sustainable development on top of the mind of people.
           
One last word. Media can do a lot of things.             But we have to remember that media is not panacea of all ills. Sustainable development has economic and other imperatives. That is a fact we have to accept and appreciate. Media can at best act as a catalyst in a socio-economic process.
***
The author, a journalist turned media academician presently heads Eastern India campus of Indian Institute of Mass Communication (IIMC) located in Dhenkanal, Odisha. He can be contacted at mrinaliimc@yahoo.in




[1] Special report : Global Warming, Time, April 3, 2006
[2] http://www.wildlifeorissa.in/
[3] http://www.orissa.gov.in/forest&environment/index.htm
[4] http://angul.nic.in/forest.htm
[5] http://www.orissa.gov.in/forest&environment/index.htm
[6] Taffler Alvin, POWER SHIFT, page 328