Window Seat | Mrinal Chatterjee |
18.9.22
Margaret
Bourke-White
I am writing a book on literature,
cinema, reports, photographs, cartoons and other art forms on partition of
India. I found that most of the photographs that we see on partition were taken
by Margaret Bourke-White (1904-1971). For the past seven and half decades, her
images have were found on the cover of numerous books, newspaper articles,
magazine features, documentaries related to Partition.
Born in New York City and raised in rural
New Jersey, Bourke-White ‘took to documentary photography in order to
disseminate the idea of inconvenient truth’. In 1936, Henry R Luce,
bought Life magazine and relaunched it, with Bourke-White
becoming one of the first photojournalist to be offered a berth there.
She arrived in India by early 1946 on
assignment to cover the transition of power, which by then was evident to
happen. She travelled around India documenting low life and high
people. She took some of the photographs of Gandhi, which later became iconic
(one with the spinning wheel comes immediately to the mind). She also took
photographs of Jinnah.
Bourke-White documented the aftermath of the so-called
Direct-Action Day in August 1946, which was announced by Jinnah following the
failure of the Cabinet Mission Plan. Her photographs of the riots in Calcutta
then are sometimes confused with the images she took following the Partition, a
year later. The article ‘The Vultures of Calcutta’ featured in the 9 September
1946 issue of Life, showing vultures waiting to prey
on the bodies of dead victims was later, intermittently and inaccurately, used
for depicting the carnage in August 1947.
Photo: Bourke-White |
She captured the Partition-related violence and migration,
as it ushered in the new dawn of independence. Her photographic essay, The Great
Migration: Five Million Indians Flee for Their Lives, was published
in Life magazine on 3 November 1947. She wrote: “All roads between India and Pakistan were
choked with streams of refugees. In scenes reminiscent of the Biblical times,
hordes of displaced people trudged across the newly created borders to an
uncertain future”
In 2010, Pramod Kapoor published Witness
to life and freedom: Margaret Bourke-White in India & Pakistan with
a reprint of over 100 of her photographs. Kapoor wrote about them thus: “They
offer a kind of stately, classical view of misery, of humanity at its most
wretched, yet somehow noble, somehow beautiful”.
Family of Rani Laxmibai
The image of the Rani Laxmibai riding a horse with her
8-year-old son Damador Rao tied on her back with a cloth battling the British
soldiers is sketched in everyone’s mind, thanks to the folktales, paintings and
later plays and films. I often wandered what happened to her son, the minor
Prince of Jhansi? Did he survive after Laxmibai’s martyrdom?
Recently I came across couple of articles, which said he did-
with great difficulty as many refused to help him and the persons loyal to Rani
Laxmibai, who were trying to protect him. He was forced to live in almost
anonymity in Indore. After Damador Rao died his son Laxman Rao Jhansiwale, was
given a pension of Rs 200 per month by the Britishers till India gained
independence. Laxman Rao and his next four generations continued to live an
anonymous life in Indore. Later, they shifted to Nagpur, where the sixth
generation descendant works in a software company and prefers to lead an
anonymous life.
Technology and rising disinformation
Disinformation and fake news have become a menace globally.
Governments across the world are struggling to enact laws to contain the
menace. However, the problem is that technology
advances far more quickly than government policies.
Thanks to bigger data, better algorithms, and custom hardware, in
the coming years, individuals around the world will increasingly have access to
cutting-edge artificial intelligence. From health care to transportation, the
democratization of AI holds enormous promise. Yet as with any dual-use technology,
the proliferation of AI also poses significant risks. Among other concerns, it
promises to democratize the creation of fake print, audio, and video stories. Fueled by advances in artificial intelligence and decentralized
computing, the next generation of disinformation promises to be even more
sophisticated and difficult to detect.
The lawmakers, therefore, as Chris
Meserole and Alina Polyakova of
Brookings Institution write: lawmakers should focus on four emerging threats in
particular: the democratization of artificial intelligence, the evolution of
social networks, the rise of decentralized applications, and the “back end” of disinformation.
Tailpiece: Why just two?
A man walks into a bar and orders 3
beers.
The bartender asks him why he gets
three beers the man told the bartender well one is for me and the other two,
for my brothers who live in Chandigarh.
The man does this for about a week and one day the man
walks in and orders two beers instead of three. The bartender asks him why just
two?
The man said, well my wife told me I had to quit drinking
but she didn’t say anything about my brothers to stop.
++
Journalist turned media academician
Mrinal Chatterjee lives in Dhenkanal, Odisha. He also writes fiction and plays.
He can be contacted at mrinalchatterjeeiimc@gmail.com
No comments:
Post a Comment